1
El patrocinio como factor condicionante en el desarrollo
de las carreras de los deportistas de élite españoles.
Desigualdades por género y tipo de deporte
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the
development of the careers of Spanish elite
athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of
sport.
ARTICLE
Escuela Universitaria Mediterrani (Universidad de Girona)
Director of the Business Department and Coordinator of the Degree in Marketing at the
Escuela Universitaria Mediterrani de Barcelona (University of Girona). PhD in Business
Administration from the University of León. Accredited as Associate Professor and Professor
of Private University by ANECA. Lecturer in the Department of Business Administration at
the University of Barcelona. Formerly Professor at the University of León. Economic Analyst
and Principal Researcher, responsible for preparing social, economic and labour reports on
the Spanish veterinary sector for his employer’s association, the Spanish Veterinary Business
Confederation (CEVE), attached to the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations
(CEOE). He has published subject manuals and various research articles on business
organisation, communication, marketing, environmental economics, the veterinary, and
automotive sectors.
oscar.gutierrez@eum.es
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4417-6310
Escuela Universitaria Mediterrani (Universidad de Girona)
PhD in Journalism (cum laude) from the UAB. University Professor (ANECA) and Associate
Professor (AQU). Lecturer at UPF, URL, Escuela Universitaria Mediterrani (UdG), UOC, EAE-
UPC. Director of CECABLE. He has published more than a hundred indexed scientic articles.
jf.fondevila@eum.es
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6587-939X
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón
Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón
13
OBRA DIGITAL, 24, December 2023, pp. 13-30, e-ISSN 2014-5039
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25029/od.2023.371.23
1414
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
1. INTRODUCTION
Sponsorship has become one of the funda-
mental sources of nancing for the best ath-
letes in each discipline to face the competitions
in which they participate. In this context, nu-
merous sports contracts are signed in which
athletes are provided with the necessary equip-
ment to compete at the best level and some-
times nancial aid is oered so that they can
continue their sports training. In any case, there
is a great inequality of sponsorship among the
various disciplines; likewise, the gender of the
athlete inuences the amount of support re-
ceived from the major brands.
If we are aware of the great impact generated
by sponsorship contracts in today’s sport, the
main objective of this research is to try to ana-
lyze the inuence of a sports sponsorship con-
tract on the development of an elite athlete’s
Abstract
The importance of sponsorship has increased
a lot in recent years, being essential in the rec-
ognition of elite athletes. The main objective of
this study is to determine the scope that spon-
sorship has on the athlete’s success, analyzing
the dierences based on gender, discipline
or country where the profession is practiced.
Qualitative methodologies have been used
(personal interviews and focus groups with elite
Spanish athletes). It is concluded that obtaining
a sponsor is not the same easy for all athletes,
depending largely on the chosen discipline,
gender, the country in which the activity takes
place and previous sporting successes.
KEYWORDS
Patrocinio; marketing; deporte; perspectiva
de género; redes sociales
Resumen
La importancia del patrocinio se ha incremen-
tado mucho en los últimos años, resultando
esencial en el reconocimiento de los deportis-
tas de élite. El objetivo de este estudio es deter-
minar el alcance que sobre el éxito del deportis-
ta tiene el patrocinio, precisando las diferencias
en función de género, disciplina o país donde
se ejerce la profesión. Se han empleado meto-
dologías de tipo cualitativo (entrevistas perso-
nales y focus group a deportistas españoles de
élite). Se concluye que obtener un patrocina-
dor no resulta igual de sencillo para todos los
deportistas, pues inuye la disciplina, el género,
el país o los éxitos precedentes.
PALABRAS CLAVE
Patrocinio; marketing; deporte; perspectiva
de género; redes sociales
Alba Gracia-Conde
Escuela Universitaria Mediterrani (Universidad de Girona)
Pre-doctoral researcher at the Department of Business at the Escuela Universitaria Mediterrani
de Barcelona (University of Girona). Graduate in Marketing from the University of Girona. Her
lines of research are communication and sports marketing. This is her rst participation in
research of this kind.
albagc1999@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-8372
RECEIVED: 2023-01-10 / ACCEPTED: 2023-02-03
1515
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
career. This work focuses mainly on how this
nancing is inuenced by the discipline prac-
ticed and the country where the practice takes
place. It also aims to analyze the gender dier-
ences that can currently be detected and the
interests of major brands in their decision to
invest in a person. To this end, we will provide
the vision on the sponsorship of dierent rep-
resentatives of the country’s sports scene and
what it has meant throughout their sporting ca-
reer in their dealings with brands.
2. THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORK
2.1. IMPORTANCE OF
SPORTS SPONSORSHIP IN
THE COMMUNICATION
STRATEGY OF COMPANIES
In today’s society, sport has a great sociocultur-
al relevance, so big brands seek to be present
in the most important sporting events in the
world, which represent extraordinary oppor-
tunities for companies and other institutions
to showcase their brands and products, or
promote their image through an intense and
positive association between advertiser and
sport, in terms of value and experience (Gines-
ta-Portet and De-San-Eugenio, 2014; Keshkar
et al., 2019; Aragonés-Jericó et al., 2020). In
this sense, sports sponsorship, understood as
agreements between companies and profes-
sional athletes or sporting events, is increas-
ingly present in the strategic communication
decisions of companies, since the actions car-
ried out in this eld usually oer a proven prof-
itability at the level of notoriety, consumer ac-
ceptance, capital-image positioning and sales,
as their products more easily achieve greater
international recognition (Lobillo-Mora et al.,
2016; Breva-Franch et al., 2019; Koronios et al.,
2020; Lázaro-Marcé et al., 2021; Koronios et al.,
2022).
Sports marketing has evolved signicantly in re-
cent decades, due to the widespread use of the
Internet. This has created a context in which, in
a simpler way than before, sports fans can show
a high degree of involvement in dierent disci-
plines and competitions. On the other hand,
companies manage to be constantly informed
about the tastes of their customers and analyze
the motivations and concerns about the peo-
ple, teams or tournaments that audiences fol-
low (Beech and Chadwick, 2007; Fondevila-Gas-
cón, 2012; Da-Silva and Las-Casas, 2017). A
scenario has thus been shaped in which sport,
media, communication and marketing have
been integrated so that, thanks to the use of
new digital technologies, it is possible to gen-
erate more ecient sponsorship strategies,
both for sports organizations and associated
brands (De-Moragas-Spà, 2020; Garza-Segovia
and Kennett, 2022; Cornwell, 2023). In this new
framework, corporate investments in this type
of sponsorship tend to have good returns, es-
pecially if the association achieved with what
is sponsored provides a positive brand image.
Thus, consumers increase their degree of satis-
faction with the brands and products acquired
due to sponsorship, also allowing an easier
purchase decision, while professional athletes
or sponsored sports entities capture one of the
revenues that usually has a large weight in their
accounts (Yousaf et al., 2018; Lee and Jin, 2019;
Kunkel and Biscaia, 2020).
2.2. DETERMINANT FACTORS
IN SPORTS SPONSORSHIP
AND ELECTION OF ATHLETES
The most relevant factors for driving sports
sponsorship policies among companies are
customer loyalty, employee motivation, repu-
tation and image improvement, eective com-
1616
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
bination with the use of social networks, inno-
vation, the emergence of a good opportunity,
positive consumer response, corporate social
responsibility and brand revaluation (Miragaia
et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2019; Navarro-Picado,
2019; Contreras-Espinosa, 2021). Once spon-
sorship is implemented, companies try to re-
cover or monetize their investment, through
fan involvement and brand recognition and
positive image associations generated in the
long term (Smith et al., 2008; Kwon and Shin,
2019; Gutiérrez-Aragón et al. 2021). In any case,
measuring the return value of an investment in
a sports sponsorship is an extremely complex
task, as this return depends, to a large extent,
on the positioning and prior knowledge of the
brand in the market and the sustainability over
time of the investments, which favor the recog-
nition and association of the brands to specic
projects, athletes or sports entities (Brewer and
Pedersen, 2010; Walraven et al., 2014; Abril et
al., 2018).
On the other hand, regarding sponsorship of
individual athletes, although not all sports enjoy
the same sponsorship conditions and there is
an increasing eort to combat possible inequal-
ities, the most common form of contract nego-
tiation is carried out through agencies special-
izing in this eld. These agencies reach reach
cession agreements of certain rights of the ath-
lete in exchange for certain services, material
or, in the best cases, periodic sums of money
more or less large, depending on the gender
or media impact of the athlete, the discipline
or the country in which he or she exercises his
or her activity (Buser et al., 2020; Manzenreiter,
2021; O’Connor, 2021). Sponsorship contracts
signed under these parameters, in the absence
of a global regulation relating to sport and its
sponsors, are dierent in each country, de-
pending on their respective regulations, so that
situations that are legal in a given country may
not be legal in another, due to issues relating
to salary or income ceilings of the teams (Gar-
cia and Meier, 2016; Akhmetshina et al., 2017).
Thus, for example, while university sport enjoys
extensive funding and a large public following
in Anglo-Saxon countries, these competitions
in Spain bear a heavy burden of indierence
from the public; this results in university sports
being relegated in many cases, and their in-
frastructure and investment are precarious
(Blanco-García and Burillo, 2018; Brunton and
St Quinton, 2021). Apart from the relevant legal
considerations regarding the country in which
the investment will take place and the dierent
sociocultural rules that operate there, these
contracts have to take into consideration both
the needs of the sponsored athlete, the events
and disciplines in which he or she participates,
and the communication objectives of the spon-
soring company. In this way, it is avoided that
low social acceptance of the sponsoring com-
pany causes the loss of the investment (Mikhail-
itchenko et al., 2012; Montes et al., 2014; Kesh-
kar et al., 2019).
The companies’ selection of professional ath-
letes to be sponsored will depend on their re-
sults and their sports image, or on the media
presence of their discipline; but it will also de-
pend on the values represented for society and
their moral exposition to the community, be-
sides the potential brand visibility in function of
the products that they want to promote. (Cre-
spo-Celda, 2020; Torres-Romay y García-Mirón,
2020). Other valuable aspects in the same
sense are the phenomenon of shared experi-
ence, international relevance, and the volume
of participants in the events. Thus, some var-
iables are relegated, in many cases, like spec-
tators’ preferences and even athletes´ needs
(Rutter et al., 2019; Wakeeld et al., 2020). In this
eld, big multinationals usually bet for sponsor-
ship contracts with big athletes with worldwide
1717
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
recognized prestige (such as Cristiano Ronaldo,
Leo Messi, Rafael Nadal, Lewis Hamilton o LeB-
ron James), able to associate the brand and the
company’s products with their own personal
brand, mainly through their use in social net-
works, where they have millions of followers.
(Zhou et al., 2020). Another successful strategy,
mainly on extreme athletes, has been to be-
come ocial sponsors of those disciplines, or-
ganizing competitions and challenges, provid-
ing all the material needed by athletes (e.g., Red
Bull). This is a way to reinforce, through the use
in social media directed to a wide community
of fans, their brand image, that ends up being
directly related more with risk, as concept, than
with the product itself that is promoted (Kunz et
al., 2016; Næss y Tickell, 2019).
2.3. SPORTS SPONSORSHIP
AND GENDER INEQUALITY
One of the relevant issues in the sponsorship
of professional athletes lies in the fact that, de-
spite the cultural and social evolution of recent
decades, gender inequalities in terms of invest-
ment are still very signicant in some countries.
Although it is also true that there is an increas-
ing number of them trying to issue regula-
tions in this eld that lead to the requirement
of similar conditions, both in terms of gender
and the discipline exercised (Lafrance-Horning,
2018; Moawad, 2019; Norman et al., 2021; Ye-
nilmez, 2021). In this sense, although it is also
a phenomenon that aects male athletes to a
lesser extent, there are many female athletes
who are harmed by the reduced social scope
of their disciplines, both in the purely nancial
aspect and in their own psychological state,
especially if the sports results are not present
and there is a loss of sponsorship (Keshkar et
al., 2019; Sait and Bogopa, 2021). In any case,
although women’s sport has traditionally been
underrepresented in the media, in recent years
there has been a notable increase in its visibility
that heralds the advent, in many countries, of a
new era in terms of media coverage. This cov-
erage will have to favour increased investment
in sponsorship in the future, both for athletes
and competitions (Darvin and Sagas, 2017; Pet-
ty and Pope, 2019; Billings and Gentile, 2021).
Even so, while greatly appreciating this posi-
tive evolution, it should not be forgotten that,
like so many other socioeconomic elds, sport
has unfortunately also been aected by the
COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to contrac-
tual repercussions and reductions in salaries
and sponsorship for many professional and
semi-professional sports women. A commercial
prioritization of male athletes is revealed again
that favours economic precariousness of fe-
males (Bowes et al., 2020; Clarkson et al., 2020;
Parry et al., 2021). However, once it is possible
to recover normality in the health area, the so-
cial background that was previously being es-
tablished is encouraging, as there seems to be
a great involvement of both public and private
organizations, either through scholarships for
the training of athletes or the promotion of
professional sponsorship, as an expression of
the social character of the brand. This will serve
to favour and support gender equality in sport
(Fernández-Morillo, 2019; Martínez-Abajo et al.,
2020; Sanahuja-Peris et al., 2021).
3. METHODOLOGY
In order to achieve the research objectives
and to carry out an in-depth study of the cur-
rent situation of sponsorship of Spanish elite
professional athletes and its relative weight or
importance in their careers, a combination of
methodologies has been chosen; it is under-
stood that, in this way, the research can achieve
a greater knowledge of the subject under
study (Webb et al. 1966; Bericat, 1998; Gutiér-
1818
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
rez-Aragón et al., 2022). For this purpose, two
qualitative techniques were used: semi-struc-
tured interviews with top athletes from dier-
ent sports disciplines, and a focus group with
a group of athletes who were considered rel-
evant to the objectives of the research. The in-
terviews were conducted between January and
April 2021 and the focus group was carried out
in June of the same year.
Specically, nineteen interviews were conduct-
ed with athletes (eight men and eleven women)
from dierent sports disciplines practiced in
Spain. They were chosen for their sporting ca-
reer and success and for their dierent experi-
ences in terms of sports sponsorship. Depend-
ing on the personal situation of the interviewee
and the specic sport he or she practiced, the
interviews could vary in structure and format;
the conversation was allowed to ow natural-
ly, in order to collect reliable qualitative data.
In any case, in order to shape the line of argu-
ment required by the research guidelines, each
of the interviewees was asked the same eight
open-ended questions, among other ques-
tions, so that they could express their feelings
and opinions on the issues raised. It was con-
sidered appropriate to obtain as broad a view
as possible of the current context of sponsor-
ship, so not all the sports chosen have a high
media and social visibility in the country. It was
precisely because of their lesser relevance, in
this sense, that they were chosen. Thus, it was
possible to analyze the real impact of sponsor-
ship in each case (Table 1).
Since, in general, women’s sports in Spain have
had less social consideration, the athletes were
chosen for their relevance in their sport. All
of the selected cases have stood out in their
disciplines in recent years; most of them have
gone through high performance centres and, in
many cases, have been called up to the nation-
al team on repeated occasions. Three of the
athletes were chosen for the interview because
they were training in the United States, which
would serve as a point of comparison in terms
of sponsorship with a pioneering country in this
eld. The interviews provided a large amount of
information of interest, so, in order to analyze
the information in depth, systematize the data
obtained and organize the results, they are di-
vided into three large blocks. In the rst of these,
a comparison is made between genders, based
on the most common responses between the
two. In the second block, an in-depth analysis
is made of the responses oered by women
grouped according to four variables of interest:
the world of motorsports, the Spanish national
team, their stay in the United States and minor-
ity sports. Finally, the same was done with the
men’s responses, grouping them into four sec-
tions: major disciplines, retired athletes, Span-
ish national team and minority sports.
1919
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
Athlete Sport
Relevance for the research
Marta García Car racing
Women in an eminently masculine sport
Emma Reyes Rhythmic gymnastics Minority sport. Spanish national team
Marina Bassols Tennis Gender gap with respect to male tennis
Laura Ester Ramos Water polo
World champion (Spanish national team)
Agustina Talasimov Basketball Works in the U.S.
Anna Grima Volleyball Minority sport
Júlia Gutiérrez Volleyball Part of his career in the U.S.
Ester Ribera Beach volleyball Has competed in the world circuit
Melanie Serrano Football
Gender gap in men’s football
Laia Muñoz Football
Works in the USA
Berta Abellán Trials Women in a predominantly male sport
Rubén Gracia “Cani” Football Professional career in elite teams
Pau Martínez Football Athlete at the beginning of her career
Miki Juanola Football Athlete at the beginning of her career
Jaime Fernández Basketball Athlete at the beginning of her career
Ignacio Alabart Roller hockey Minority sport
Cristian Portelli Surng
Minority sport
Guillermo Fayed Alpine skiing He competes with the French national ski team
Àngel Mullera Athletics European medallist (Spanish national team)
Table 1
Interviewed athletes and sports
Source: own elaboration
It was considered appropriate to complement
the study with a focus group of ve athletes
from dierent disciplines, which would allow,
on the one hand, to resolve certain doubts
that were not resolved in the interview phase,
and, on the other hand, to reveal other signi-
cant factors on the subject of the research that
could be of interest to the study. All participants
have a long experience in their eld of sport
and with current sponsors and were chosen for
certain characteristics that were relevant to the
study (table 2). As a starting point, they were
presented with a questionnaire similar to the
interview questionnaire, in order to generate a
discussion among them and to get their opin-
ion on the questions raised in the study.
2020
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
Table 2
Composition of the Focus group
Athlete and sport
Motivación para su
participación
Agustina Talasimov
(Basketball)
Extensive experience with
sponsorship in the USA (her
institution informs about
changes every season).
Berta Abellán (Tri-
als)
Breaks gender stereotypes in
the sport (the number of fe-
male pilots is quite small).
Miki Juanola (Foot-
ball)
He is the youngest home-
grown athlete to participate in
the study. His place of training
is key in terms of his spon-
sorship.
Cristian Portelli
(Surng)
Extensive experience in spon-
sorship from an early age,
despite being part of a very
minority discipline in Spain.
Guillermo Fayed
(Alpine skiing)
By competing for the French
national team, he can bring a
dierent vision to the table.
Fuente: elaboración propia
4. RESULTS
4.1. SEMI-STRUCTURED
INTERVIEWS
In order to detect dierences in sponsorship
models between disciplines and genders and
to be able to contrast them with each other,
ve football players (trained in some of the
best quarries in Spain), two basketball players
and three volleyball players with a wide na-
tional background were interviewed, as well as
high-level representatives of sports with a less-
er social following such as rhythmic gymnas-
tics, trial, motor racing, surng, tennis, alpine
skiing, athletics, water polo and hockey. The
interviews conducted with the sportsmen and
sportswomen, within the exibility allowed by
the semi-structured modality, made it possible
to gather reliable information on the subject
analyzed, obtained from conversations carried
out within the naturalness allowed by a pro-
cess of this type. In this sense, when designing
the research, it was considered appropriate to
maintain a minimum set of questions of major
relevance to the study, which were asked to all
the people interviewed. Six of the results ob-
tained from these questions have been pro-
cessed, categorized and tabulated according to
gender, in order to achieve a quantitative treat-
ment that facilitates a better interpretation of
the results (table 3).
Thus, a rst approximation of the data obtained
in the interviews shows that 87.50% of the men
interviewed, whether active or not, had spon-
sorship contracts during the study, in contrast
to 63.64% of the women. In the case of the
male athletes, the only one who did not have
a valid contract was the athlete Àngel Mullera,
who received support from his own local coun-
cil; therefore, when he stopped competing,
his contract was terminated. The also retired
Guillermo Fayed (third in the world in down-
hill alpine skiing) and Rubén Gracia “Cani” (who
played for several Spanish football teams) still
have a contract with the brands that oer them
clothing and equipment, even though they are
no longer active. Young footballers Miki and
Pau enjoy individual sponsorship contracts
with Puma and Adidas, respectively; these con-
tracts, in addition to funding, provide them
with all the necessary competition material and
other clothing throughout the season. As for
women, those who are still competing today
and are at the top of their sport have contracts
with brands that help them to continue their
sporting commitments by providing them with
equipment. In contrast to men, sportswomen
who are no longer competing or whose per-
formance has deteriorated have automatically
had their contracts terminated.
The male sportsmen interviewed whose disci-
pline is a mass sport (football and basketball)
2121
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
MEN WOMEN TOTAL
Do you cur-
rently have a
sponsorship
contract?
YES 87,50% 63,64% 73,68%
NO 12,50% 36,36% 26,32%
Were you at
the top of
your sport
when you
started your
sponsorship
contract?
YES 50,00% 72,73% 63,16%
NO 50,00% 27,27% 36,84%
Is sponsor-
ship a key
factor in your
career?
YES 50,00% 100,00% 78,95%
NO 50,00% - 21,05%
Do you think
that the
conditions of
sponsorship
are similar
regardless of
the gender of
the athlete?
YES 37,50% 45,45% 42,11%
NO 62,50% 54,55% 57,89%
Do you think
there are
dierences in
sponsorship
conditions
between dis-
ciplines?
YES 100,00% 72,73% 84,21%
NO - 27,27% 15,79%
Do you think
that there are
dierences
in the condi-
tions of spon-
sorship in the
United States
compared to
Spain? (*)
YES - 100,00% 100,00%
NO - 0,00% 0,00%
Table 3
Summary of questionnaire interviews on sponsorship
(*) This question was only asked to sports women
pursuing their professional careers in the United Sates.
Source: own elaboration
state that their contracts with sports brands
started when they were still in the lower cat-
egories of their club. The situation is very dif-
ferent for the other four athletes from minority
disciplines, as it was much more complicated to
get a sponsor, as they had to win national titles.
On the other hand, all the women interviewed
who are currently practicing their profession in
Spain admit that they had to be the best in their
disciplines and win several titles in order for a
sponsor to be interested in them. The case of
the Spanish sports women currently competing
in the United States is dierent, as they enjoy a
sponsorship contract just for the fact of being
part of their university team and competing at
a good level.
Overall, 78.75% of the sportsmen and women
interviewed believe that sports sponsorship is
vital for their development and training. How-
ever, while only half of the men considered this
requirement to be essential, all the women
agreed that, at present, without a sponsoring
brand, they would not be able to continue their
professional careers in their disciplines. The
four men who signed sponsorship contracts
when they were in lower categories (majority
sports) do not attach too much importance to
this type of sponsorship, as they see it as an
extra in their career and could develop their
career without it. However, since they have
this economic boost and since this incentive is
good, they take advantage of it. The four men
who belong to minority sports disciplines argue
that, for them, sports sponsorship is very im-
portant, as the equipment they use on a daily
basis is very expensive. They also point out that
reaching the elite requires a lot of eort and
sacrice, so getting sponsors increases their
motivation to keep ghting for more titles and
not lose them.
2222
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
The results of the study found that 57.89% of
the respondents felt that sponsorship condi-
tions are not equal depending on the gender of
the athlete. The three sportswomen belonging
to American universities point out that in this
type of sport, a woman and a man receive the
same conditions for sports sponsorship within
their institution, as there are regulatory norms
that oblige both to receive the same budget
and the same facilities. Ester Ribera (beach
volleyball) and Marina Bassols (tennis), despite
competing in Spain, point out that in their dis-
ciplines there is not too much dierence in
sponsorship in terms of gender. However, for
the ve members of more minority sports, the
sponsorship situation is quite complex, partly
due to the fact that the visibility and inuence
of women’s sport in these disciplines is practi-
cally non-existent. Thus, although sponsorship
has increased in recent years, they feel that it is
still far from what is oered to men, and their
conditions are much more demanding. Among
the men interviewed, Rubén Gracia “Cani” was
the only one who acknowledged that women
receive worse sponsorship conditions. Ath-
letes from minority disciplines perceived that,
in their sports, women are on an equal footing
with men, arguing that they enjoy similar visibil-
ity, as the championships are held at the same
venue and on the same day for both, so the im-
pact should be the same. When taking into con-
sideration the great contrast of perspectives
on the visualization of this issue by the dier-
ent interviewees, it is especially relevant to see
how this situation is perceived by the young-
est athletes: Miki, Pau and Jaime (football and
basketball). Although they have had sponsors
since their youth career, they claim to be totally
unaware of the dierences between genders in
sports sponsorship contracts. Ignacio Alabart
(roller hockey) also shared this opinion.
On the other hand, 84.21% of the interviewed
sportsmen and sportswomen appreciate the
existence of dierent sponsorship conditions
between the various disciplines. In general, it is
evident that there is a great deal of inequality
in sponsorship between mainstream and mi-
nority sports, as many disciplines receive a tiny
amount of money and material compared to
what is received in mass sports such as foot-
ball. The footballers interviewed are aware of
the advantages of their sport in this respect,
although they warn that the main cause is that
much more money is involved and much more
prot is generated. The three sportswomen
who compete in the United States explain that
there is more equality between the dierent
disciplines there, even though not all sports
have the same sponsorship budget. This is be-
cause the law does not allow individual spon-
sorships, so the best brands sponsor the whole
institution so that the best athletes in each dis-
cipline promote their products. Finally, many of
the participants in the study note that the wide-
spread use of social media as a communication
tool may be a major driver of sponsorship con-
tracts in less socially embedded sports. This en-
courages a levelling of sponsorship conditions
between disciplines.
4.2. FOCUS GROUP
The second phase of the research consisted
of a focus group of ve athletes from dierent
disciplines, with the aim of providing feedback
on the information obtained in the interviews
and conducting a debate based on the argu-
ments and opinions that emerged (table 4). The
main objective of using this qualitative analysis
tool was to obtain information on the generic
particularities of individual sports sponsorship
in Spain. The responses, statements or revela-
tions that appeared most frequently in the fo-
cus group conrmed, among other things, the
2323
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
Most frequent response Other high frequency responses
What does your contract mainly
consist of?
Receive appropriate sports clothing for
competition each season.
Participate in brand events
What obligations or conditions
does your sponsorship contract
entail?
Promote the material received in social
networks and competitions and do not
use material from competitors.
Occasionally it may be possible to nego-
tiate with another brand for a particular
material.
Failure to comply automatically voids the
contract.
How often do you receive ma-
terial?
In general, athletes are provided with
equipment whenever they need it.
The brand supplies the material and
sends it out whenever there are new
items.
In the ocial shop, you could always get
what you wanted (competition clothing
on a monthly basis).
Do you think it is important for
your career to be sponsored?
There is no doubt about it. It is essen-
tial
Majority disciplines: it is an extra in the
career and contributes to the image.
Minority disciplines: without sponsorship
it is not possible to survive as an athlete.
Are there substantial dierences
in sponsorship between the
United States and Spain?
There is a huge dierence. In the
United States there is much more
investment in sport (it is more profes-
sionalized).
University sport is considered profes-
sional
Just by being part of a university team
you get sponsorship.
Are there signicant gender dif-
ferences in sponsorship?
In most cases, women do not enjoy the
same opportunities as men.
There are dierences depending on the
discipline and the country.
It is more equal in minority sports
Source: Own elaboration
Table 4
Summary table Focus group. Most frequent response
need for sponsorship for athletes, the impor-
tance of receiving sports clothing and equip-
ment in order to compete in certain disciplines,
the existence of signicant inequalities in spon-
sorship based on gender, and the dierences
between the United States and Spain in spon-
sorship at the university level.
5. DISCUSSION
The main objective of this article was to nd out
and analyze the inuence that a sports spon-
sorship contract has on the career of an elite
athlete, as well as to discern the existence of
possible dierences or inequalities depend-
ing on the athlete’s gender, the discipline he/
she practices and the country where he/she
practices his/her profession. For this purpose,
2424
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
a methodological triangulation has been prac-
ticed, carrying out two dierent types of qualita-
tive analysis. This was done in order to achieve
a more complete vision of the subject matter of
the research (Webb et al., 1966; Bericat, 1998;
Gutiérrez-Aragón et al., 2022).
The results of this study show that, currently,
thanks to technological advances, the evolution
of companies’ marketing strategies and the
widespread use of social networks as a means
of communication, brands can make their
products known globally, which is why there
is great interest in sponsoring professional
players and sporting events. This is a practice
that usually oers a proven return in terms of
notoriety, inuence on fans, image and sales
(Miragaia et al., 2017; Breva-Franch et al., 2019;
Kim et al., 2019; Navarro-Picado, 2019; Koroni-
os et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020; Contreras-Es-
pinosa, 2021). For companies, it is particularly
important, in this sense, to carry out a study of
various factors related to the athlete or event
to be sponsored that may end up inuencing
their choice. Thus, depending on the dierent
regulations and socio-cultural aspects that
may aect public acceptance in each country,
it will be possible to choose those sponsorship
investments that can achieve the expected re-
turn (Mikhailitchenko et al., 2012; Montes et al.,
2014; Keshkar et al., 2019). On the other hand,
it is becoming increasingly common for a com-
pany to sponsor or organize events, providing
the necessary materials to the athletes. This
helps to reinforce the brand image, so that it
relates to the competition itself and not to the
products it oers (Kunz et al., 2016; Næss and
Tickell, 2019).
There are many types of individual sport spon-
sorship contracts, although in most cases
they involve an agreement to cede the ath-
lete’s rights in exchange for services, materials
or money, which will be of greater or lesser
amount or importance depending on gender,
discipline or country (Garcia and Meier, 2016;
Akhmetshina et al., 2017; Buser et al., 2020;
Manzenreiter, 2021; O’Connor, 2021). A large
body of previous academic work, as well as
the results obtained in this research, point to
the fact that gender inequalities in sponsor-
ship are generally contrastable. It is estimated
that, more often than not, women do not enjoy
the same opportunities or facilities in nding a
company to sponsor them, nor the same con-
ditions as their male counterparts when spon-
sorship is nally achieved (Lafrance-Horning,
2018; Moawad, 2019; Norman et al., 2021; Ye-
nilmez, 2021).
Another factor that undoubtedly causes ine-
quality in the formats and amounts of spon-
sorship is the discipline practiced by each ath-
lete, as companies are not as willing to invest
in sponsorship in mass sports as they are in
those that are minorities in terms of their fol-
lowing. This is because the nancial return on
the investment made, in terms of communica-
tion, will largely depend on the media presence
of the discipline (Rutter et al., 2019; Torres-Ro-
may and García-Mirón, 2020; Wakeeld et al.,
2020). On the other hand, although there are
many factors that inuence the performance of
athletes, one of the most relevant is the pres-
sure to achieve sporting titles and not lose their
sponsorships, since, without these, in minority
sports, it is very dicult to continue with a pro-
fessional career (Keshkar et al., 2019; Sait and
Bogopa, 2021).
2525
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
6. CONCLUSIONS
Obtaining sponsorship is not equally easy for
all athletes, as this is inuenced by a number of
variables. For example, all the female athletes
in the study who were no longer in the elite of
their sport lost the sponsorship of the brands
that sponsored them; the brands stopped pro-
viding them with equipment, even though the
athletes continued to compete. On the other
hand, the men who were no longer active con-
tinued to keep their contracts in force. Also,
among the athletes participating in the study,
those involved in mass sports had received
sports sponsorship before reaching the elite,
while those in disciplines with a lesser social fol-
lowing found it much more dicult. In most of
the cases, they had to contribute with sporting
achievements rst, before receiving funding.
Moreover, all of the women interviewed noted
that, in their sports training, it is essential to re-
ceive nancial support, whether from private
entities or public subsidies. The three Spanish
sportswomen who belong to university teams in
the United States recognised that sport there is
much more professionalized and that there is
greater regulatory control of sports contracts,
in order to guarantee greater equality in terms
of sponsorship among the members of the
teams that participate in competitions, both by
gender and between disciplines.
In short, athlete sponsorship as a marketing
and communication technique and an ele-
ment of potential commercial persuasion has
been gradually gaining presence in dierent
disciplines over the last few decades, through
outstanding sportsmen and women. For many
of them, sponsorship is an essential source of
funding for the development of their profes-
sional careers; without this type of support, in
many cases, they would have to give up sport.
However, inequalities are quite marked in
terms of access to relevant contracts, so ob-
taining sponsorship with sucient guarantees
will depend on the sporting discipline, gender,
the country in which the activity is being carried
out and the sporting successes that have been
achieved beforehand.
In carrying out this study, limitations have been
encountered which, logically, derive from the
willingness to collaborate in the research on
the part of the sportsmen and women who
were proposed, some of whom declined to par-
ticipate. On the other hand, the fact that one of
the researchers is a professional sportsperson
also meant that many interviews could be car-
ried out in conditions of cordiality and complic-
ity, which made it possible to obtain data that
might not otherwise have been possible. Thus,
the study has tried to contribute to clarifying, to
a certain extent, many of the unknowns raised
by the subject analyzed, although, logically, at
the same time, it has also generated new ques-
tions that open up future lines of research and
work. These lines of research could be of in-
terest to both sport and communication pro-
fessionals and academic researchers. Among
these lines of study are the analysis of the sal-
ary and socio-labour gap between the men’s
and women’s sections of top-level clubs (main-
ly football and basketball), and between mass
and minority sports.
2626
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
REFERENCES
Abril, C., Sánchez, J. y Recio, T. (2018). How does wall street react to glob-
al sports sponsorship announcements? An analysis of the eect on
sponsoring companies’ stock market prices. Journal of Advertising Re-
search, 58(3), 297-310.
Akhmetshina, E. R., Ignatjeva, O. A. y Ablaev, I. M. (2017). Tendencies and
prospects of public-private partnership development in the eld of
physical culture and sport. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2A),
422-430.
Aragonés-Jericó, C., Küster-Boluda, I. y Vila-López, N. (2020). Transferencia
valor-experiencia a través del patrocinio deportivo: antecedentes y
consecuencias. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 29(1), 133-142.
Beech, J. G. y Chadwick, S. (2007). The marketing of sport. Pearson Education.
Bericat, E. (1998). La integración de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la
investigación social: Signicado y medida. Ariel.
Billings, A.C. y Gentile, P.C. (2021). Flag before Gender Biases? The Case for
National Identity Bolstering Women Athlete Visibility in Sports Me-
ga-Events. En K. Dashper (Ed.) Sport, Gender and Mega-Events (Emerald
Studies in Sport and Gender) (pp. 221-238). Bingley: Emerald Publishing
Limited.
Blanco-García, P. y Burillo, P. (2018). La situación actual del deporte univer-
sitario en España para el alumnado universitario. SPORT TK: Revista Eu-
roamericana de Ciencias del Deporte, 7(1), 87-96.
Bowes, A., Lomax, L. y Piasecki, J. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 lock-
down on elite sportswomen. Managing Sport and Leisure.
Breva-Franch, E., Sanahuja-Peris, G., Mut-Camacho, M. y Campos-López, C.
(2019). Inversión y evaluación del patrocinio deportivo en España. Re-
vista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 9(17), 139-164.
Brewer, R. M. y Pedersen, P. M. (2010). Franchises, value drivers and the ap-
plication of valuation analysis to sports sponsorship. Journal of Sponsor-
ship, 3(2), 181-193.
2727
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
Brunton, J.A. y St Quinton, T. (2021). Applying Stage-Based Theory to engage
female students in university sport. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise,
16(1), 11-25.
Buser, M., Woratschek, H. y Schönberner, J. (2020). The business model of
sponsorship engagement in sports: brief and straight to the point.
SMAB Relevant Management Insights, 8(1), 1-6.
Clarkson, B.G., Culvin, A., Pope, S. y Parry, K.D. (2020). Covid-19: Reections
on threat and uncertainty for the future of elite women’s football in
England. Managing Sport and Leisure.
Crespo-Celda, M. (2020). Las cláusulas de moralidad en los contratos de patroci-
nio deportivo. Madrid: Editorial Reus.
Contreras-Espinosa, R.S. (2021). Las redes sociales en la comunicación: un
tema de discusión constante, Obra Digital, 20, 10-13.
Cornwell, T. B. (2023). Digital Transformation in Sport Sponsorship. En M.L.
Naraine, T. Hayduk y J.P. Doyle (edit.). The Routledge Handbook of Digital
Sport Management (pp. 116-131). Routledge.
Da-Silva, E.C. y Las-Casas, A.L. (2017). Sport fans as consumers: An approach
to sport marketing. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(4), 36-48.
Darvin, L., y Sagas, M. (2017). Objectication in sport media: Inuences on a
future women’s sporting event. International Journal of Sport Communi-
cation, 10(2), 178-195.
De-Moragas-Spà, M. (2020). Deporte y comunicación: un siglo de sinergias.
En N. Puig-Barata y A. Camps-Povill (coord.). Diálogos sobre el deporte
(1975-2020) (pp. 412-421). Editorial INDE, Generalitat de Catalunya.
Fernández-Morillo, C. (2019). Derechos y deberes de los medios de comuni-
cación en la promoción de la igualdad de género. Hachetetepé, Revista
Cientíca de Educación y Comunicación, 18, 99-107.
Fondevila-Gascón, J.F. (2012). El uso de recursos del periodismo digital en
la prensa del Reino Unido, Francia, Estados Unidos y España. Estudios
sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 18(1), 73-87.
García, B. y Meier, H.E. (2017). Global sport power Europe? The ecacy of the
European Union in global sport regulation. Journal of Common Market
Studies, 55(4), 850-870.
Garza-Segovia, M. y Kennett, C. (2022). Digitalization and sports sponsorship
strategy: A review and research agenda. Annals of Applied Sport Science,
10(4), e1066.
Ginesta-Portet, X. y De-San-Eugenio, J. (2014). The use of football as a coun-
try branding strategy. Case study: Qatar and the Catalan sports press.
Communication & Sport, 2(3), 225–241.
2828
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
Gutiérrez-Aragón, Ó., Gassiot-Melian, A. y Alabart-Algueró, J. (2021). Uso,
aceptación y repercusión de las redes sociales y los inuencers en el
sector ecuestre. Doxa Comunicación, Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudios
de Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales, 32, 115-142.
Gutiérrez-Aragón, Ó, Alcaraz-Espriu, E. y Solano-Tatché, M. (2022). Efectos
de la masicación turística y de los cambios en el consumo sobre los
mercados locales. El caso de La Boquería de Barcelona. Pasos, Revista
de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 20(1), 153-167.
Keshkar, S., Lawrence, I., Dodds, M., Morris, E., Mahoney, T., Heisey, K., Ad-
desa, F., Hedlund, D.P., Dickson, G., Ghasemi, H., Faruq, A., Naylor, M.
y Santomier, J. (2019). The role of culture in sports sponsorship: An
update. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 7(1), 57-81.
Kim, D., Ko, Y., Lee, J.L. y Kim, Y.C. (2019). The impact of CSR-linked sport
sponsorship on consumers’ reactions to service failures. International
Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 21(1), 70-90.
Koronios, K., Dimitropoulos, P., Travlos, A., Douvis, I. y Ratten, V. (2020). On-
line technologies and sports: A new era for sponsorship. The Journal of
High Technology Management Research, 31(1), 100373.
Koronios, K., Ntasis, L., Dimitropoulos, P. y Ratten, V. (2022). Not just inten-
tions: predicting actual purchase behavior in sport sponsorship con-
text. Sport, Business and Management, 12(1), 4-28.
Kunkel, T. y Biscaia, R. (2020). Sport brands: Brand relationships and consum-
er behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 29(1), 3-17.
Kunz, R. E., Elsässer, F. y Santomier, J. (2016). Sport-related branded enter-
tainment: the Red Bull phenomenon. Sport, Business and Management,
6(5), 520-541.
Kwon, H. y Shin, J.E. (2019). Eects of brand exposure time duration and fre-
quency on image transfer in sport sponsorship. International Journal of
Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 21(1), 170-190.
Lafrance-Horning, D. (2018). Consumer response to cause-related sport
sponsorship: does gender matter? Journal of Marketing Trends, 5(2),
143-162.
Lázaro-Marcé, J., Gutiérrez-Aragón, Ó. y Fondevila-Gascón, J.F. (2021). Inu-
encia de la colaboración entre las áreas de ventas y marketing en los
resultados de las empresas en un entorno de orientación al mercado.
Revista de Estudios Empresariales, Segunda Época, 2/2021, 44-63.
Lee, J.Y. y Jin, C. (2019). The eect of sponsor’s brand on consumer-brand re-
lationship in sport sponsorship. Global Business & Finance Review, 24(1),
27-43.
2929
Óscar Gutiérrez-Aragón, Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Alba Gracia-Conde
Lobillo-Mora, G., Ginesta-Portet, X. y Badia, J. (2016). El patrocinio solidario
en el fútbol español. El caso de la Liga BBVA: De lo global a lo local.
Ámbitos, Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 32, 1-15.
Manzenreiter, W. (2021). The business of sports and the manufacturing of
global social inequality. Esporte e Sociedade, 2(6), 1-22.
Martínez-Abajo, J., Vizcarra-Morales, M., Lasarte-Leonet, G. y Aristizabal-Llor-
ente, P. (2020). La nanciación del deporte de alto rendimiento femen-
ino en la CAPV. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y
Recreación, 39, 289-297.
Mikhailitchenko, A.G., Tootelian, D.H. y Mikhailitchenko, G.N. (2012). Exploring
saturation levels for sponsorship logos on professional sports shirts: a
cross-cultural study. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Spon-
sorship, 13(2), 2-16.
Miragaia, D.A., Ferreira, J. y Ratten, V. (2017). Corporate social responsibility
and social entrepreneurship: Drivers of sports sponsorship policy. In-
ternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(4), 613-623.
Moawad, J. (2019). Gender inequality in sports. FairPlay, Revista de Filosofía,
Ética y Derecho del Deporte, 13, 28-53.
Montes, F., Sala-Garrido, R. y Usai, A. (2014). The lack of balance in the Span-
ish rst division football league. European Sport Management Quarterly,
14(3), 282-298.
Næss, H.E. y Tickell, S. (2019). Fan engagement in motorsports: a case of the
FIA World Rally Championship. The Journal of Media Innovations, 5(1),
31-44.
Navarro-Picado, J.F. (2019). Sponsorship sales is not only a sport, but an in-
stitutional business as well: evidence from two professional football
clubs in latin-america. Estudios de Administración, 26(2), 82-100.
Norman, M., Donnelly, P. y Kidd, B. (2021). Gender inequality in Canadian
interuniversity sport: participation opportunities and leadership posi-
tions from 2010-11 to 2016-17. International Journal of Sport Policy and
Politics, 13(2), 207-223.
O’Connor, J.J. (2021). The means to an end: an examination of gender ine-
quality in athletic aid distribution and graduation rates. Sport in Society,
24(4), 534-550.
Parry, K.D., Clarkson, B.G., Bowes, A., Grubb, L. y Rowe, D. (2021). Media fram-
ing of women’s football during the Covid-19 pandemic. Communication
& Sport.
Petty, K., y Pope, S. (2019). A new age for media coverage of women’s sport?
An analysis of English media coverage of the 2015 FIFA Women’s World
Cup. Sociology, 53(3), 486-502.
3030
Sponsorship as a determining factor in the development of the careers of
Spanish elite athletes. Inequalities by gender and type of sport
Rutter, R., Nadeau, J., Aagerup, U. y Lettice, F. (2019). The Olympic Games and
associative sponsorship: Brand personality identity creation, commu-
nication and congruence. Internet Research, 30(1), 85-107.
Sait, S. y Bogopa, D. (2021). Anthropological Inquiry on Gender Inequality:
The Case of Women Soccer in Gelvandale, Port Elizabeth. Gender and
Behaviour, 19(2), 17864-17874.
Sanahuja-Peris, G., Martínez-Fernández-Pedraza, P. y López-Font, L. (2021).
El post-patrocinio deportivo en la era post-pandemia. En G. Sanahuja-
Peris, S. Mayorga-Escalada y F.J. Herrero-Gutiérrez (coord.). Deporte y
comunicación: una mirada al fenómeno deportivo desde las ciencias de la
comunicación en España (pp. 209-252). Tirant Humanidades.
Smith, A., Graetz, B. y Westerbeek, H. (2008). Sport sponsorship, team sup-
port and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Communications,
14(5), 387-404.
Torres-Romay, E. y García-Mirón, S. (2020). Patrocinio deportivo femenino.
Situación actual y tendencias. Comunicación y Género, 3(2), 125-137.
Wakeeld, L., Wakeeld, K. y Keller, K.L. (2020). Understanding sponsorship:
A consumer-centric model of sponsorship eects. Journal of Advertising,
49(3), 320-343.
Walraven, M., Bijmolt, T.H. y Koning, R.H. (2014). Dynamic eects of sponsor-
ing: How sponsorship awareness develops over time. Journal of Adver-
tising, 43(2), 142-154.
Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D. y Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive
measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Rand McNally.
Yenilmez, M. I. (2021). Gender Inequality and Female Sports Participation in
Turkey. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, 33, 27-
41.
Yousaf, A., Mishra, A. y Gupta, A. (2018). Concurrent sponsorship: implications
for sponsoring brands and sponsored property. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 36(6), 633-645.
Zhou, F., Mou, J., Su, Q. y Wu, Y.C.J. (2020). How does consumers’ Perception
of Sports Stars’ Personal Brand Promote Consumers’ brand love? A
mediation model of global brand equity. Journal of Retailing and Con-
sumer Services, 54, 102012.